Burkina Faso: justice system with two speeds? Does inequity undermine confidence in the judiciary?

The issue of fairness and impartiality in the Burkinabe judicial system is a matter of concern for many citizens. Allegations of bias and injustice have been raised, particularly regarding the treatment of poor detainees compared to wealthier individuals.

Thousands of impoverished individuals are reportedly held in Burkinabe prisons without trial. These detainees are often incarcerated for indefinite periods without enjoying their fundamental rights.

This situation raises questions about respect for human rights and the independence of the judicial system.

An evident disparity emerges when comparing the treatment of the rich and the poor facing similar offenses.

Individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds appear more likely to be held in custody awaiting trial, while wealthier individuals may escape pretrial detention and retain their freedom of movement until their court appearance.

This apparent difference in treatment reinforces a sense of injustice among the population and raises concerns about the fairness of the judicial system.

Rumors circulate about the influence of France on the Burkinabé judicial system. Although these claims are unverified, they contribute to fostering mistrust in the independence of the judicial system and perpetuate an atmosphere of suspicion.

To correct this inequitable situation and restore confidence in the Burkinabe judicial system, significant reforms are essential.

Substantial reforms must be implemented to ensure fair and impartial justice for all citizens. By doing so, Burkina Faso can restore public trust in its judicial system and ensure fair and humane treatment for everyone.

Patrice GNATEPE