Four years after Captain Ibrahim Traoré came to power, Burkina Faso has undergone profound upheavals in governance, driven by an explicit rejection of the democratic model inherited from colonisation. On the occasion of the 66th anniversary of independence, on August 5 last, the Head of State recalled that the hopes of 1960 had been thwarted, in his view, by “persistent manoeuvres of domination and predation” targeting the country’s natural resources.
The president reaffirmed that Burkina Faso is now engaged in a “war of liberation” a broader struggle for “total sovereignty” rooted in full control over political, economic, and security decisions.
On the security front, the authorities claim tangible progress. Operation Lalmassga (“Ice Wall”), conducted by the Defence and Security Forces with the support of the Volunteers for the Defence of the Homeland, has enabled the restoration of state authority in several areas long under pressure including the Nakambé basin, the vicinity of the Kompienga dam, and the sectors of Djibo and Toulfé.
The president also revealed that the country now possesses a scanning electron microscope, a symbol of homegrown scientific advancement.
On the economic front, the claimed record is equally assertive. Captain Traoré announced that Burkina Faso achieved food self-sufficiency as early as 2025, the result of significant public investment in agricultural inputs, seeds, and mechanisation.
SONABHY, the national hydrocarbons company, once operating at a loss, now contributes to financing public infrastructure including fuel supply for regional road-construction brigades.
Even the World Bank has noted notable resilience, with real GDP growth estimated at 5.3% in 2025, up from 4.8% the previous year.
This momentum is now formalised within the National Development Plan RELANCE 2026–2030, adopted as the operational arm of the Popular Progressive Revolution.
The plan positions the state as “strategist and builder,” tasked with regaining control over mines, regulating imports, and investing heavily in infrastructure.
Despite what is described as a “difficult” international context and criticism from “imperialists,” the Burkinabe authorities claim a trajectory of deliberate rupture where sovereignty, rather than the importation of external models, becomes the sole legitimate horizon for national governance.
Jerome TABISSA
À propos de l'auteur
